The Kerala High Court had on August 7 lifted the life ban imposed on him by the BCCI in the wake of the 2013 IPL spot-fixing scandal.
Ever since the ban was lifted on Sreesanth, the 34-year-old, who took to acting during his time away from the game, started training in full spirit, and received whole-hearted support from the Kerala Cricket Association. A single bench of the court had on September 18 ordered the BCCI to lift the ban, after observing that it can not agree with the BCCI's stand that Sreesanth's exoneration by a Delhi court in 2015 doesn't matter.
Sensex Slumps 102 Points to 32506, Nifty Down at 10192
The early indicator of NSE Nifty - SGX Nifty Futures - was trading 0.4% lower at 10,221 points on the Singapore Stock Exchange. Hong Kong's Hang Seng was down 0.09 per cent while Japan's Nikkei rose 0.13 per cent in early trade today.
A division bench of the Kerala High Court on Tuesday ruled that the BCCI ban can not be overturned or reduced, thereby negating a judgement issued by the same court in August, which had asked the board to lift the ban.
Part of the Rajasthan Royals, Sreesanth was banned by the BCCI's disciplinary committee after IPL 2013 along with Ankeet Chavan and Ajit Chandila after having been accused of spot-fixing. HC Judge A Muhamed Mustaque had also set aside all proceedings against Sreesanth initiated by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).
Chelsea v Roma: Buoyant Blues can move closer to knockout stages
Conte was keen to sign Fernando Llorente from Swansea City but Tottenham hijacked that move, leaving the Blues empty-handed. Kante , it's the first time. 'Kante it is the first time he has played play three games in a row.
The BCCI, however, had refused to alter its disciplinary decision even after the verdict.
Allowing the appeal filed by BCCI, Division Bench headed by Chief Justice held that there is no violation of natural justice against the cricketer. While ruling in Sreesanth's favour, the court had said that there was no incriminating evidence to pinpoint his involvement in match-fixing. "God is great." Sreesanth said. The writ court, the division bench pointed out, could not overstep its brief and become an "appellate" power over BCCI; doing so would be "exceeding the limits of judicial review". It said Sreesanth had actually violated the BCCI's anti-corruption code, having failed to inform the anti-corruption unit about the illegal activities despite receiving education from the ACU.
Rafael Nadal pulls out of Swiss indoors in Basel
The head-to-head record between the two legends still stands comfortably in favour of Nadal, who has won 23 of their 38 meetings. Federer beat the Spaniard at the Shanghai Masters on Sunday to close the gap at the top of the ATP rankings.
"This is the worst decision ever... special rule for me?" said Sreesanth in a series of tweets on Tuesday. A division bench of the court in Kochi said that it can not conduct a judicial review of the life ban imposed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and therefore upheld the appeal. What about Chennai Super Kings?